Author Archive

Offshore Financial Centre

Taxation

Although most offshore financial centre originally rose to prominence by facilitating structures which helped to minimise exposure to tax, tax avoidance has played a decreasing role in the success of offshore financial centres in recent years. Most professional practitioners in offshore jurisdictions refer to themselves as “tax neutral” since, whatever tax burdens the proposed transaction or structure will have in its primary operating market, having the structure based in an offshore jurisdiction will not create any additional tax burdens.

A number of pressure groups suggest that offshore financial centre engage in “unfair tax competition” by having no, or very low tax burdens, and have argued that such jurisdictions should be forced to tax both economic activity and their own citizens at a higher level. Another criticism levelled against offshore financial centres is that whilst sophisticated jurisdictions usually have developed tax codes which prevent tax revenues leaking from the use of offshore jurisdictions, less developed nations, who can least afford to lose tax revenue, are unable to keep pace with the rapid development of the use of offshore financial structures

Judicial Doctrines to Combat Tax Shelters

Judicial doctrines to combat tax shelters

Aside from the attempts to stop tax shelters in the United States through provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, U.S. courts have several ways to prevent tax sheltering activities from happening. The judicial doctrines have a basic theme: to invalidate a transaction that would achieve a result contradictory to the intent or basic structure of the tax code provisions at issue. The following are the judicial doctrines:

1) The Substance over form doctrine

This doctrine is based on the premise that if two transactions have the same economic result, they should have the same tax result. To achieve this a similar tax result, it can be necessary to look at the substance of the transaction rather than the formal steps taken to implement it.

2) The Step transaction doctrine

Similar to the substance doctrine, the step transaction doctrine treats a series of formally separate steps as a single transaction to determine what really was going on with the transaction.

3) The Business Purpose Doctrine

Courts will invalidate a transaction for tax purposes under this doctrine when it appears that the taxpayer was motivated by no business purpose other than to avoid tax or secure some tax benefit. This judicial inquiry largely is dependent on the taxpayer’s intent.

4) The Sham Transaction Doctrine

This doctrine looks for transactions where the economic activities giving rise to the tax benefits do not occur. A clear example of this doctrine is seen in Knetsch v. United States, 364 U.S. 361.

5) The Economic Substance Doctrine

Under this doctrine, courts will invalidate the tax transaction if the transaction lacks economic substance independent of the tax considerations. This doctrines questions whether the purported economic activity would have occurred absent the tax benefits claimed by the taxpayer.

The IMF Working Paper

It has been remarked more than once that whether a financial centre is characterized as “offshore” is really a question of degree. Indeed, the IMF Working Paper cited above notes that its definition of an offshore centre would include the United Kingdom and the United States, which are ordinarily counted as “onshore” because of their large populations and inclusion in international organisations such as the G20 and OECD.[8]

The more nebulous term “tax haven” is often applied to offshore centres, leading to confusion between the two concepts. In Tolley’s International Initiatives Affecting Financial Havens[9] the author in the Glossary of Terms defines an “offshore financial centre” in forthright terms as “a politically correct term for what used to be called a tax haven.” However, he then qualifies this by adding, “The use of this term makes the important point that a jurisdiction may provide specific facilities for offshore financial centres without being in any general sense a tax haven.” A 1981 report by the IRS concludes, “a country is a tax haven if it looks like one and if it is considered to be one by those who care.”

With its connotations of financial secrecy and tax avoidance, “tax haven” is not always an appropriate term for offshore financial centres, many of which have no statutory banking secrecy,[10] and most of which have adopted tax information exchange protocols to allow foreign countries to investigate suspected tax evasion.[11]

Views of offshore financial centres tend to be polarised. Proponents suggest that reputable offshore financial centres play a legitimate and integral role in international finance and trade, and that their zero-tax structure allows financial planning and risk management and makes possible some of the cross-border vehicles necessary for global trade, including financing for aircraft and shipping or reinsurance of medical facilities.[12] Proponents point to the tacit support of offshore centres by the governments of the United States (which promotes offshore financial centres by the continuing use of the Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC)) and United Kingdom (which actively promotes offshore finance in Caribbean dependent territories to help them diversify their economies and to facilitate the British Eurobond market)

Offshore Finance Industry

Scrutiny

Offshore finance has been the subject of increased attention since 2000 and even more so since the April 2009 G20 meeting, when heads of state resolved to “take action” against non-cooperative jurisdictions.[13] Initiatives spearheaded by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) and the International Monetary Fund have had a significant effect on the offshore finance industry. Most of the principal offshore centre considerably strengthened their internal regulations relating to money laundering and other key regulated activities. Indeed, Jersey is now rated as the most compliant jurisdiction internationally, complying with 44 of the “40+9″ recommendations.

In 2007 The Economist published a survey of offshore financial centre

The International Monetary Fund (Headquarters ...

; although the magazine had historically been very hostile towards OFCs, the report represented a shift towards a very much more benign view of the role of offshore finance, concluding:

Although international initiatives aimed at reducing financial crime are welcome, the broader concern over OFCs is overblown. Well-run jurisdictions of all sorts, whether nominally on- or offshore, are good for the global financial system.

Tax Shelters

tax shelters are usually created by the government to promote a certain desirable behavior, usually a long term investment, to help the economy; in turn, this generates even more tax revenue. Alternatively, the shelters may be a means to promote social behaviors. In Canada, in order to protect the Canadian culture from American influence, tax incentives were given to companies that produced Canadian television programs.

In general, a tax shelter is any organized program in which many individuals, rich or poor, participate to reduce their taxes due. However, a few individuals stretch the limits of legal interpretation of the income tax laws. While these actions may be within the boundary of legally accepted practice in physical form, these actions could be deemed to be conducted in bad faith. Tax shelters were intended to induce good behaviors from the masses, but at the same time caused a handful to act in the opposite manner. Tax shelters have therefore often shared an unsavory association with fraud.

Offshore Financial Centre

Offshore centres benefit from a low burden of regulation. An extremely high proportion of hedge funds (which characteristically employ high risk investment strategies) who register offshore are presumed to be driven by lighter regulatory requirements rather than perceived tax benefits. Many capital markets bond issues are also structured through a special purpose vehicle incorporated in an offshore financial centre specifically to minimise the amount of regulatory red-tape associated with the issue.

Offshore centres have historically been seen as venues for laundering the proceeds of illicit activity  However, following a move towards transparency during the 2000s and the introduction of strict AML regulations, some now argue that offshore are in many cases better regulated than many onshore financial centres. For example, in most offshore jurisdictions, a person needs a licence to act as a trustee, whereas (for example) in the United Kingdom and the United States, there are no restrictions or regulations as to who may serve in a fiduciary capacity.The leading offshore financial centres are more compliant with the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering’s ’40+9′ recommendations than many OECD countries.

Some commentators have expressed concern that the differing levels of sophistication between offshore financial centres will lead to regulatory arbitrage,[23] and fuel a race to the bottom, although evidence from the market seems to indicate the investors prefer to utilise better regulated offshore jurisdictions rather than more poorly regulated ones. A study by Australian academic found that shell companies are more easily set up in many OECD member countries than in offshore jurisdictions. A report by Global Witness, Undue Diligence, found that kleptocrats used French banks rather than offshore accounts as destinations for plundered funds

6 How to Work on a Boring Job

How you on your work? Love of the job is to make us a higher chance for success. However, not all parts of the work we have is fun. There are certain things that make us feel less comfortable, less free, or unrestrained while working.

Do not think much about it
One way to accomplish a job that was not too fun is to not think much about it deeply. Of course you still have to concentrate while doing it but if you keep busy with work done, rather than  or think, your mind will be distracted and sidetracked from the negative thoughts that make it productive. Thinking about the fear of something that has not happened is a waste of manpower and time.

Find an alternative way to do it
Another way to cope is to find an alternative way to do it. For example, if you do not like the monotony of office administrative tasks, do the methods vary,  do with music, or in a quiet and minimal disruption.

Do it without delay
The delay will make the burden heavier. When the task is completed quickly, the weight you will feel much lighter. Once freed from the job less enjoyable, the thought and energy you can more freely focus to other tasks more enjoyable.

Do it bit by bit
Doing the same time be burdensome. Doing little by little will feel lighter. Discipline is also required here. You have to consistently do it little by little, do not miss the schedule already determined.

Give praise to himself as he started
Remember that when you begin a task that is difficult or boring, you’re doing a job that is avoided and hated by many people. Starting is the hardest part in that process. But once you’ve started, it might be difficult to stop working because you benefit from the momentum.

For example, you could decide to work 5-10 minutes to do one job. After you work in the amount of time, see if you still want to stop doing or do you still continue.

Every time you start the toughest part of a job, we would feel very confident after a good pass. We know very well that the situation could worsen.

Remember your past experience
Every person must have completed a difficult job before, but do you remember how you feel afterwards? Completing a difficult and overwhelming it often makes us feel satisfied and confident.

When a heavy work appears, focus on the positive feelings you had before that can be felt when you’re done. Positive feelings that help you to start with your work and finish it with ease. Whenever we start a job, remember to be aware of the positive feelings that can be felt after wards.

Analysis of short-term assets and long-term

See below section to determine what assets are owned by the company. Under the debt, you may find the obligations borne by the company. Reduce overall debt of the amount of total assets in order to know whether the company is in a good or bad. If the obligation or debt that is owned more than the amount of assets, it can be concluded that the company has more debt than assets. The result of this reduction is also called net worth.

  • Analysis of short-term assets and long-term. Long-term assets thinner likely to fluctuate than short-term assets. Determine how much can companies gain from short-term assets and long term.
  • Add all of the assets owned by the company and for the amount by the amount of overall debt. This will show the financial status of the company in terms of profit. For a healthy company, that number should double the amount of corporate debt.
  • Consider the income statement to determine how companies spend money they had. This will show where the capital is spent and for what purpose the amount spent. For those who invest in the company, the income statement will provide detailed information about the company spending.

Choosing a good domain name

Choosing a good domain name is critical to the success of your business. Site’s domain name can have a big impact. The logic is the same as site selection business outlets. If you open stores in strategic locations, your business will crowded visitors. The same applies for the domain name. Here are six things that must be owned domain name for your business bring in maximum profits.

1. Memorable
A good domain name should be remembered. Sure, there are functions “bookmarks” on the internet. But the fact is many people do not take advantage of the key functions of this bookmark. Therefore, make sure your domain name easy to remember. His name should be easy and memorable, and assertive. Avoid complexity and avoid initials or abbreviations.

2. Brief
Twenty characters is the maximum. It would be better if only ten. Domain names are long and complicated will complicate others. Domain name ideally less than ten characters, a good domain name in character between 10 to 20 characters.

3. Proper extension
There are several domain extensions available,. Com for commercial entities,. Net for network providers ISP,. Org for organizations institutions,. Edu for educational institutions,. Mil for military organizations, and. Int for international. Specific extensions to function better than others, depending on needs. Extension. Com is still by far the most extensions and most widely used. Extension to the two is best. Net.

4. Easily spelled
Domain names are hard to spell would be difficult for you and your customers. A good domain name should contain words that are easy to say, have a combination of words or letters are good, commonly used in everyday life, and does not contain words that are totally foreign.

5. Descriptive
A good domain name should be descriptive. In other words, when your visitors, customers or potential customers see your domain name, they instantly knew immediately address what it refers to the effort.

6. Not using the symbol
Do not create domain names that contain numbers or hyphens. Even if it’s easy to remember domain name, people just will not usually pay attention to symbols